Feast of St. Burl
NOT ON THE CPAN
Today's article is about code not found on the CPAN.
The Good Old Days
Today is the feast of St. Burl, the little known patron saint of gophers. In his honor, I'd like to talk a little about the Gopher protocol and my on-again, off-again affection for it.
Since I first made a home page some time around 1995, it has included an opening something like this:
I made my first home page back when HTML 1.1 was just coming out and some guy named Mozilla was releasing Netscape, which he said would replace the NCSA Mosaic browser. I'll let you in on a little secret: I didn't believe for a minute that HTTP would replace such tried-and-true services as Archie, Veronica, and (my favorite) Gopher.
Years later, when I had learned how to write non-trivial programs, I decided I would write a Gopher server, which meant reading the Gopher spec. It looked sort of weird, but easy enough to implement a test server:
All this server could do was print a directory. You could ask for the other stuff it had to offer, but you wouldn't get it. Anyway, the directory is good enough for us to look at Gopher a little. It's a bunch of tab-delimited lines, which would look like this, as a table:
+--------------------+------------+-----------+------+ | Type, Display Name | Selector | Host | Post | +--------------------+------------+-----------+------+ | 1Directory Listing | / | localhost | 70 | | 0README.TXT | README.TXT | localhost | 70 | | 0README.TxT | README.TxT | localhost | 70 | +--------------------+------------+-----------+------+
The Gopher request to get that listing goes like this:
CLIENT: connect, send "/" and CRLF SERVER: send tab-delimited lines, followed by . and CRLF, then disconnect
When the Gopher client gets that table, it turns it into a menu like this:
[ Dir ] Directory Listing [ File ] README.TXT [ File ] README.TxT
The user can pick one of three options and get a new document. The first option leads to another directory and the other two lead to files. We know this because the first character of the lines was either
0 (a directory) or
1 (a file). This is crucial, because we need to know, if we're getting a text file, that we shouldn't look for tabs and display it as a menu.
This leads to the first big problem. See, imagine what happens if we try to get README.TXT:
CLIENT: connect, send "README.TXT" and CRLF SERVER: send a bunch of lines, followed by . and CRLF, then disconnect
How do we know that what we got back was a text file and not a directory listing? There's nothing in the request or the response telling us. We need to know before making the request, because the directory told us what to expect. Gopher predates URIs, but if it didn't, we might imagine that the URI for the README file was the whole line:
In fact, when Gopher was given its own scheme, the above locator would look read
gopher://localhost:70/0README.TXT but it would often be rewritten as
gopher://localhost:70/0/README.TXT. (In HTTP this problem doesn't exist, because every response includes a declaration of the type of the content.)
So, what does this mean in practical terms? My first guess was that it just meant that we'd have a simple transport layer to get bodies, and then a slightly more complex presentation layer to display the body based on what it expected. Unfortunately, that doesn't play out. See, zero and one aren't the only content types. There are about 124 possible values, although only a few are assigned. Here are two troublesome ones that are assigned:
5 - binary file (for DOS) 9 - binary file
(How do the two differ? Nobody seems to have any idea.)
The trouble is that you're prohibited from encoding binary files, even if they contain the pattern CRLF-dot-CRLF. That means you can't detect the end of stream, and there may not be a terminal CRLF. So, the client must wait until the server disconnects and must not truncate any trailing dot-CRLF. In that case, how does it know when to stop reading? Only by getting hung up on. That means that the context of the request (that is, its appearance in some containing directory) influences not only the presentation, but also the behavior of the network client.
If it doesn't get that "end of body" sentinel, how does it know that it got the whole document? Well, it doesn't.
There are some other weird type identifiers. "g" means a GIF image, and "I" means "some kind of image file." (It's assumed that with broad types like "I" the client will decide what to do by interpreting the selector as a file name and looking at the extension.) Both "g" and "I" can be dot-terminated. "7" means "search engine," and the client prompts the user for a search string to be concatenated to the selector before fetching. "7" is assumed to actually return a directory (a "1").
There are even some types for other protocols. For example, "T" points to an interactive tn3270 session. I must admit to being moved to feelings of nostalgia by that -- like finding "troff" as a top-level MIME-type-like classification for in an early email RFC. If we added "h" as a type for HTTP, we could say:
+--------------------+------------+-------------------------+------+ | Type, Display Name | Selector | Host | Post | +--------------------+------------+-------------------------+------+ | hAdvent Calendar | /2010 | advent.rjbs.manxome.org | 70 | +--------------------+------------+-------------------------+------+
We don't need to mandate that "h" also means "expect HTML," because HTTP requires that the server tell us what it's giving us. Once we're off into HTTP land, we really have entered a web of interconnected documents of all types, using uniform resource locators. (Did you notice, by the way, that because Gopher gives us "links" only in directory listings, we can't provide hypertext in Gopher without a new type definition? A text file ("0") in Gopher can't contain links.
Today's Gift, As-Is
I still sometimes think back on the apparent simplicity of Gopher. It could be emulated in HTML pretty easily. Maybe I'll write a DTD for a subset of XHTML that gets you something like Gopher. In the past, though, I was young and idealistic and less willing to compromise. I really wanted to write a fun little framework for Gopher servers in Perl. I even wanted to make it part of my 2009 Advent calendar, but disappointment with the protocol and its implications for implementing and testing overwhelmed me.
I have since given up the idea of ever finishing it, so I present to you, unfinished, Net::Gopher::Server!